Direct Democracy proposal for Home Affairs, Security and Policing

Enhancement of the right to personal privacy

Direct Democracy - Audio Direct Democracy and Cyber Warfare | Video

Should the People's Administration install direct democracy, we propose to enhance the right of privacy for citizens.

To those who believe that you have nothing to fear because you have nothing to hide, let us know when you've removed the curtains from every window in your house and we might start to take you seriously but until then, why should anyone actually need to have anything to hide simply to protect and enjoy a right to privacy?

Councils, HMRC and mulitple public bodies able to view your web history
Firms banned from offering encryption - in the UK only!

If you are okay with your emails being scanned and stored by the state, would you also then be okay with your post being diverted to your nearest police station where it will be opened, read, copied and stored before it gets sent on to you?

If you are okay with your phone calls being recorded, scanned and stored by the state, would you also then be okay with your off-line face-to-face conversations being recorded, scanned and stored?

If you are okay with your web visits being stored by the state and then shared with 3rd parties, would you also then be okay to submit your dairy to the state on a daily basis, detailing which shops and houses you visited, for them to copy, store and share with 3rd parties?

If not, do you have something to hide?

The people's Administration believes that such people are naive and hypocritical because they offer propagandist opportunities to those who wish to invade our privacy, whilst seeking to protect themselves from exactly the same principals.

The government's argument that greater levels of access to our private information is needed in order to fight terrorism is in our opinion, a blatant lie and we say this because:

David Cameron himself blocked the PA's UNICEF-backed Inet Protect on-line child protection strategy [in 2013] that would have denied both terrorists and child abusers on-line access - without mass surveillance or even censorship.

We believe that the only way to prevent terrorism is to address the causes, instead of attempting to prevent terrorist actions.

As soon as David Cameron won the 2010 General Election, members of different police forces actually told us in person that they were deeply concerned that any new anti-terror legislation will be used against the citizen under the guise of the prevention of terrorism, and that the police will be used as a buffer during events of social unrest.

Current protocols do enable for the accurate identification, targeting and surveillance of possible threats and that most of those who 'slip through' are actually 'de-marked' and deliberately taken off the radar [as with the 7/7 bombers].

When it is constantly only ever human decision making that is flawed, no government has ever justified its desires to invade our privacy further.

Current protocols require that SIS [UK security services] have to obtain court orders from a judge so as to be able to obtain data in certain ways. This enables for the security services to check on every occasion, that what they seek to do is actually lawful.

Resources spent monitoring the personal and private communications and habits of millions of citizens would be far better spent on those who are already 'marked' [and who are often taken off the radar].

It is our absolute belief that the solution to ending ALL global terrorism lies in shaping foreign policy around how we ourselves expect to be treated, while educating the extremists of how their God has no needs.

Our conclusion is that by removing the requirement placed on the SIS to obtain court orders, all and any safeguards that the citizen may have to ANY legal and/or civil rights will be severely compromised. Further more, if legislation needs to be changed so as to enable our own intelligence services to be allowed to operate outside of current legal legislation, what do they have to hide?

PA direct democracy comment: Thanks to Cameron, parents can no longer protect their children
PA direct democracy comment: UK and US Gov's lied - they spied on G20 and, on every UK citizen

Should the People's Administration install direct democracy, we propose to review all current intelligence-gathering and anti-terror legislation so as to enhance the right of privacy for citizens and, to increase the focus on surveillance of more viable targets.

PA Video PA direct democracy video: EU shocked by unaccountable US surveillance
PA Video PA direct democracy video: Obama backs massive NSA civil spy strategy
PA Video PA direct democracy video: US Gov. harvests millions of phone call records
PA Video PA direct democracy video: NSA spying already happening in UK
PA Video PA direct democracy video: Facebook is mass surveillance
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: Inet Provider is watching you!
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: Software is not FREE - even if you don't pay for it!
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: UK private domestic communications to be fully accessible
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: UK Gov. to use spy devices to monitor internet
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: ISP's and governments are best friends [Christopher Sog]
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: Google - Gov's accessing private data more than ever
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: PA cyber warfare forecast confirmed - 2 years later!
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: Assange confirms PA cyber fears - 13 years later!
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: UK prosecutions - now a crime to be offensive
PA Video
PA direct democracy video: What you've already told the world - must see!
PA Video PA direct democracy video: Privacy violations committed globally by NSA

PA direct democracy proposal: Global Terrorism
PA direct democracy proposal: Review of freedom of speech and rights of self-expression laws

PA direct democracy proposal: Safeguard against the obtaining of personal contact data
PA direct democracy proposal: Microsoft to remove NSA access keys from UK-issue software
PA direct democracy proposal: Legislation to cover software that is not free/libre
PA direct democracy proposal: Cyber Defence

Voting for direct democracy outside a general election

Direct Democracy - Audio

It is up to us, the people [not the politicians] to use the power that we have always had, to choose to implement direct democracy as soon as possible.

This is not a protest campaign.

In accordance with Magna Carta Article 61 and with UN UDHR Article 21 and with all democratic principals up-held by the UN [which the UK is signed-up to], the People's Administration's Direct Democracy Twitter blog is a UN-sanctioned and legally recognised voting format for UK reform to direct democracy - even outside a general election.

Vote legitimately for a peaceful and structured UK reform to direct democracy now simply by following the People's Administration's Direct Democracy Twitter blog and when numbers reach a point of critical mass, we'll do the rest.

Follow: @self_rule

The People's Administration's constitution for reform to direct democracy and our voting protocols for implementing direct democracy have both been accepted by the UK Electoral Commission and the UN as legitimate. In a general election, the People's Administration DOES NOT have to field candidates to secure your vote on the ballot paper. Outside a general election, you can vote for a legitimate reform to direct democracy now by following @self_rule