• Government secretly licensing UK opium farms
• Utility Smart meters to be used for surveillance and ad sales
• PA FORECAST for 2013
• Mainstream media blocking the People's Administration direct democracy party
Should the UK choose to reform to direct democracy now by using existing laws and without revolution or, should the People's Administration win the next UK general election, a new administration [not another government] will be formed. All party manifestos will be merged into an on-line database and the people will become the decision-makers regarding ALL policy implementation [including their own] via an on-line voting system. Majority-voted policies will then be implemented into law by a reformed Parliament and so through direct democracy, the people will govern the people.
With direct democracy, you do not have to understand politics or become a politician. You just have to express your potential solution for anything of concern - the people and a reformed Parliament will do the rest.
The People's Administration's constitution for reform to direct democracy and our voting protocols have both been sanctioned by the UK Electoral Commission and the UN. In a general election, the People's Administration does NOT have to field candidates to secure your vote on the ballot paper. Outside a general election, you can vote for a legitimate reform to direct democracy now!
With direct democracy via web and telephony, [mis]representation by Parliament is no longer required and with direct democracy, we can reduce the social and financial pressures that force us to focus purely on surviving, and we can start living.
With direct democracy and without centralised decision-making, the politicians, the media, the religions, the unelected lords and consultants [such as multi-millionaire Alan Sugar], the corporates, the banks, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers and hidden organisations [shadow governments] of any nature can not manipulate the power any longer, as the power will be with every individual.
It's your choice - will you continue to use your existing freedom to empower a corrupt minority that costs the UK economy millions every year, or do you want true, efficient, decentralised, UN-sanctioned direct democracy? So-called 'representative democracy' is financially inefficient, democratically void and non-evolving, while decentralised direct democracy is the only true democracy [system of rule of the people] and, direct democracy as a form of governance could save millions every year.
We are musicians, producers, artists and political activists [not politicians] who have registered the People's Administration with the Electoral Commission as a mainstream UK party [since March 2010] with the ability and architecture to implement a reform to direct democracy - should the majority vote for direct democracy now or in the next UK general election.
Despite the mainstream media's knowledge of the People's Administration's founder [Alex Romane] authoring documents [published by the world-renowned British Library] regarding Political Architecture and Religious Theory, previously working directly with David Cameron [independently] prior to establishing the PA, working on the Mid-East Peace Process directly with the PLO, creating a potential £2 BN aid package for Somalia, forecasting the UK riots, creating government-adopted policies, creating a potential solution for rising sea levels and diminishing water stocks [with TV presenter and inventor Trevor Baylis] and creating sustainable solutions for the economy and for democracy itself, the mainstream media will not feature the People's Administration simply because we stand for direct democracy and people politics over representative democracy and partisan politics and, they have told us this directly.
PA Affiliate Movie: United Initiative
Includes interviews with Alex Romane, Mike Gravel [US Presidential Candidate] and others.
American foreign policy is the biggest threat to global security [after religion] and with direct democracy, the UK would no longer be America's 51st state because direct democracy would allow for independent foreign policy implementation.
With direct democracy, China [nor any other regime] will no longer be able to threaten and bribe our corrupt and weak Parliament into bending our domestic policy.
Approx. 50,000 animal and plant species become extinct every year [which threatens the food chain and substantially reduces the potential for finding medical cures] because we choose to empower those who refuse to prioritise protecting the natural environment, instead of choosing to take responsibility ourselves through direct democracy.
It would be far more strategic for single-issue protest groups [such as Occupy and the unions] to vote for a reform to direct democracy now, than it would be to continue with begging, fighting the police, and other indirect action.
When the 'Great' British people continue to vote with their money and to vote with their ballot for continued oppression, why does the UK population then complain and protest about the effects of its own decisions?
The Greek people chose to empower 'representatives' who spent more than £150 BN on arms [more than the bail-out] over the previous 10 years whilst failing to collect taxes from the rich. Since austerity was imposed, the Greeks could have chosen to reform to direct democracy but instead, they chose to protest - and now their 'representation' has been replaced with un-elected administrators, they have lost their legal right to protest, journalists are being arrested and Greece is now on the verge of civil war!
After defeating the Vikings, King Alfred used his unelected authority to define the basis of ALL English law specifically by consulting Moses' 10 Commandments. Today, the existence of the non-elected bishops in the House of Lords confirms that the UK is still a THEOCRACY and that all UK law still has religious orientation. It is the reason for why a man who becomes a parent is ONLY recognised as a father by common law if he was married [bound by a religious ceremony] to the mother at the time of conception [the name on the birth certificate has never been legal proof of paternity]. The UK is not even a representative democracy - it never has been and never will be!
'Would you like lies with that?'
Through taxes, every Atheist is funding every state and private faith school in the UK. Every Christian and Jew is funding every Islamic faith school and every Muslim is funding every Christian and Jewish faith school [while Muslim children are exempt from the same child protection laws that are afforded to every other UK child] and since late 2010, David Cameron has been pro-actively encouraging Imams [of which 80% use the radical and violent Deoband syllabus] to establish even more Islamic faith schools - while secretly acknowledging that faith schools are the primary root cause of ALL social disunity and disintegration in any culture!
The UK is the ONLY remaining theocracy in the Western world and direct democracy would be the most efficient way of ridding common law of religious law because direct democracy would automatically remove all centralised religious influence from Parliament.
[More info: Direct Democracy and Religion]
In early 2012, scientists discovered that ants and bees specifically use direct democracy and furthermore, they apportion their use of direct democracy as being fundamental to their efficiency and overall survival. In the words of the UK scientists that carried out tests on ants;"The colony's use of direct democracy greatly enhances its survival because it decentralises the decision-making which increases its ability to find better solutions faster."
Politicians are not problem solvers. They are generally from a media or legal background and neither professions involve any training in problem solving. It is engineers, technicians, scientists, philosophers, therapists, authors, artists, teachers, analysts and others who are natural problem solvers and, only direct democracy can allow for their ideas to become reality.
Without direct democracy, their ideas will remain oppressed.
If we are to be responsible citizens, how can we do this whilst refusing to take responsibility for the most fundamental decisions? Only direct democracy will enable full social responsibility.
The reason for why terrorist organisations target civilian populations is not because civilians are soft targets [as Western governments constantly tell us] but is instead actually because ultimately, it is the civilian population [the majority in any country] that is responsible for its country's system of governance. If a population chooses to shirk this responsibility and to leave all decisions to 'representatives' who the civilian population freely choose to empower, then how are civilian populations not part-responsible for the causes of terrorism?
This is also the philosophy behind why Western governments use sanctions against countries and this is why we also regard government-imposed sanctions placed upon any country as a form of terrorism.
Only terrorist organisations are responsible for their actions and while acts of terrorism can never be justified, the civilian majority is though ultimately responsible for the influences and policies that their freely-elected governments promote that give terrorists a cause and, a reason to exist.
Direct democracy is the only democracy and, direct democracy would enable whole societies to take full social responsibility for their country's policies and actions.
Whilst we have the ability to make choices, we are free and we have power. With our existing freedom, we have chosen to empower people who can't solve problems and we have got what we voted for. Now we can use our freedom to vote for self-empowerment via direct democracy.
Some say that direct democracy is tyranny over the minority but, as the nature of direct democracy is based upon self-rule [the ability to make our own choices/freedom], it can never be direct democracy itself that is flawed. We've also had a minority [Parliament] making all of the decisions - voted into power by a minority [due to lack of turnout] and it has failed to represent the majority. It is giving power to the minority that is and has always been the only tyranny and those who say that direct democracy is tyranny over the minority also deny that representative democracies and theocracies ARE systems of minority control.
We believe that social unity can only be achieved with direct democracy, where the UK electorate can create, propose and vote upon all policy implementation.
An evolved culture of politics
Within a direct democracy, the police and the law courts will be enforcing truly democratic laws as determined by the people - substantially increasing social cohesion and, UK armed forces will not be able to go to war without majority consent. Through the People's Administration, both sectors will be protected from government abuse.
The People's Administration was formed in early 2010 only after politicians and party leaders [including David Cameron] with whom the People's Administration founder has met and worked with offering voluntary independent consultation, rejected pro-democratic policy ideas despite them having over a 90% approval rate when put to voter groups by the People's Administration's founder.
The People's Administration recognises that the political axis has rotated and is now drawn between the people of all countries uniting through direct democracies, and the minority who seek to control. The people of the world have more in common with each other than they do with their own 'leaders' - who have more in common with each other than they do with their own people. The People's Administration's architecture for direct democracy has been promoted in various forms since 1998 and is now being studied as a template by various groups in other countries.
Economics: The People's Administration believes that 45 million eligible voters advised by the Institute of Fiscal Studies via direct democracy, is better than 3 heads advised by their party donors.
Fixing any Western economy is a cakewalk:
1. Reform to direct democracy
2. Stop printing money [it creates a false economy with a long-term inflation headache]
3. Take back the money given to the banks
4. Use 5% of this to establish a state-ran bank of the people
5. Put the rest back into the kitty
6. Collect new banking customers as the big banks fail [cleansing the economy of weak businesses as they go]
7. Implement alternative saving sources [such as freezing foreign aid to richer countries]
8. Put the tax rate for the richest [Dave's mates] back to 50% and close corporate tax avoidance schemes
To summarise; Tax high earners and corporations and use this money to fund an under-lying economy [through investment on social support and employment-creation projects without cuts to public services] and then settle the government debt. The current 'solution' is to settle government debt by punishing the poor and protecting the rich, which will not create wealth and could even create further debt as more and more people become unemployed as the economy retracts even further.
The previous two global financial collapses both led directly to world wars. Unlike the previous two world wars, thermo-nuclear WW3 will leave no functioning environment. Our representative democracies and our markets are now thinking and behaving in exactly the same ways as they did in the lead-up to both of the previous two world wars and it is no coincidence. A global reform to direct democracy is now the only sustainable solution.
Capitalism: Simply planting a seed and maintaining its growth through to it becoming an edible food is capitalism and it's fair and it's sustainable if we democratise and optimise [as in nature] instead of maximise.
Crime: With direct democracy, we could increase the economy whilst decreasing crime rates by legalising black markets and enhancing prisoner rehabilitation programmes - particularly Restorative Justice programmes.
Parliament's 'revolutionary' idea to make 'Digital Britain' the world leader in IT is to upgrade network infrastructure with new cables. The People's Administration's idea to make Digital Britain the world leader in electronic communications is to upgrade Parliament with Electronic Direct Democracy.
The 'mistakes' that led to hundreds of voters across the UK being denied their right to vote in 2010 would not have happened if voting by web and telephone in a direct democracy had replaced the expensive, inconvenient and out-dated method of voting via mismanaged polling stations.
The cost of the AV referendum in 2011 was £250 M. The People's Administration estimates that if administered on-line, the entire referendum could have been ran at a cost of less than £10 M - further demonstrating the coalition's absolute complacency towards technology, the UK economy, the UK electorate, and direct democracy.
It is the nature of human beings to make our own choices [to be free]. Therefore, direct democracy and self-rule is in our nature. Physicians, politicians and military planners now accept that in any circumstances, the power of resistance always eventually equals the power of oppression so eventually, direct democracy will be the culture of politics and the People's Administration's reform to direct democracy could be a positive aid to this transition.
It is an illusion that the people don't already have power. Whilst we don't believe that we have power, we abuse it. When politicians tell us that they want to give us more power, they reinforce the notion that we don't already have all of the power and the illusion is maintained but, only because we do not real-ise that we already have ALL of the power [the ability to choose to vote to maintain a theocracy, or to choose to vote for the People's Administration and direct democracy].
Money is not power. Money enables for the ability to make more choices but can never be used to control others without others in some way choosing to be controlled. This makes money power-less. It is freedom [the ability to make choices] that is the only power.
The People's Administration has no financial support, yet the People's Administration has the ability to establish direct democracy in the UK - should you choose to empower us with your vote.
This People's Administration's direct democracy proposal is a mechanism through which the people can come to know through experience, that the people already have all of the power, and to then exercise this power for the positive by choosing to reform to direct democracy.
Within a direct democracy, as well as voting upon all policy implementation, the people themselves will also be able to propose policy ideas directly to the country for a potential national vote and implementation by the People's Administration and a reformed Parliament.
If you support democracy [majority rule] in any form, it would follow that you would at least want for the majority to decide if they want to take responsibility via direct democracy - unless you also are as a politician, seeking to oppress the majority simply to satisfy your own fears?
How are the people educated enough to decide which government will control their lives, but at the same time not educated enough to make far less fundamental decisions?
Within a direct democracy, it would be the responsibility of the author of each policy to educate the voter and the responsibility of the voter to make a choice - should they so choose to.
For those who believe that direct democracy is dangerous because it enables the potential for abstract thinking to become policy, why should the majority let minority-held fears prevent such policies - however abstract or absurd even? 'Abstract'/'absurd'/'wrong'/'right' are merely opinions [not facts] and in a direct democracy, the majority can define these terms and, the majority being able to decide upon the viability of policies is what ensures that direct democracy itself can evolve.
For the minority who may still prefer that others make decisions on their behalf, they can still do this simply by abstaining from voting upon any policy implementation, whilst those who do wish to take responsibility will be able to. So-called 'representative democracy' only allows for the minority group to have power [choice], whilst direct democracy would cater for all.
If you are considering not voting, spoiling your vote or voting for 'None of the above', why not make your vote stand for direct democracy and parliamentary reform by voting for the People's Administration and reform to direct democracy?
Voting for direct democracy outside a general election
It is up to us, the people [not the politicians] to use the power that we have always had, to choose to implement direct democracy as soon as possible.
This is not a protest campaign.
Following the People's Administration Direct Democracy Party [a mainstream registered party since March 2010] on Twitter, gives us your permission [when a majority] to invoke existing laws under UN Articles 21 and 61 [which the UK is signed-up to], so as to take immediate control of all policy decision-making by forming a legitimate UN-sanctioned direct democracy with majority election and without revolution, in the UK.
The People's Administration's constitution for reform to direct democracy and our voting protocols have both been accepted by the UK Electoral Commission and the UN as legitimate. In a general election, the People's Administration does not have to field candidates to secure your vote on the ballot paper. Outside a general election, you can vote for a legitimate reform to direct democracy now!